In this section, we will review the concepts of roots and radicals. Please note that in this book we stay within real numbers, and we do not consider complex numbers. In particular, when we talk about roots, we mean real roots.
We say that a number \(y\) is a root of order 2 (a square root) of a number \(a\) if \(y^2 = a\text{.}\) We say that a number \(y\) is a root of order 3 (a cube root) of \(a\) if \(y^3 = a\) and so on.
Let \(a\) be a given number and let \(n\) be a positive integer. We say that \(y\) is a root of order \(n\) of \(a\text{,}\) or an \(n\)th root of \(a\text{,}\) if \(y^n = a\text{.}\)
For example, let \(a = 4\text{,}\)\(n = 2\text{.}\) The number \(4\) has two roots of order \(2\text{:}\)\(y = 2\) and \(y = -2\text{.}\) Of course, \(2^2 = (-2)^2 = 4\text{.}\) On the other hand, let \(a = -4\) and \(n = 2\text{.}\) The number \(-4\) has no roots of order \(2\text{,}\) since there are no numbers whose square is \(-4\text{.}\) We say that the square root of \(-4\)does not exist.
Take \(a = -64\) and \(n = 3\text{.}\) The number \(-64\) has exactly one root of order 3 which is \(y = -4\text{.}\) Indeed, \((-4)^3 = -64\text{.}\) Observe that \(4^3 = 64\) so 4 is not a cube root of \(-64\text{.}\)
If \(a \gt 0\text{,}\) then \(a\) has two \(n\)th roots, one positive and one of the same magnitude but negative. We denote the positive \(n\)th root as:
\begin{equation*}
\sqrt[n]{a}
\end{equation*}
(We use the βradicalβ symbol \(\sqrt{\,\,}\text{.}\)) The two \(n\)th roots can then be written as
We are looking for all numbers \(y\) such that \(y^4 = 81\text{.}\) The order, \(4\text{,}\) is even. Hence, we have two roots, one positive and one negative. The positive root is denoted by \(\sqrt[4]{81}\) and the two roots are:
\(7\) has two roots of order \(2\text{:}\)\(\sqrt{7}\) and \(-\sqrt{7}\text{.}\) We cannot easily guess them as they are not integers. We can use our calculator, though, and calculate \(\sqrt{7} \approx 2.65\text{.}\) The two roots are then approximately \(2.65\) and \(-2.65\text{.}\)
The order, \(3\text{,}\) is odd. Hence, there is only one root of order \(3\) of \(-27\) denoted as \(\sqrt[3]{-27}\text{.}\) As \((-3)^3 = -27\text{,}\) we have
By definition, \(x\) is a root of order \(n\) of \(a\) if \(x\) is a solution to the equation:
\begin{equation*}
x^n = a
\end{equation*}
Hence, roots and radicals appear naturally when solving equations containing powers of the unknown. We saw plenty of radicals in Chapter 3 in the context of quadratic equations.
Let \(a\text{,}\)\(b\) be given numbers. Let \(n\text{,}\)\(m\) be positive integers. Then the following equalities hold provided that the roots involved exist, and both sides are defined:
To extend the definition to fractional exponents \(a^{\frac{m}{n}}\text{,}\) we will use roots. In the first step, for every positive integer \(n\text{,}\) we define \(a^{\frac{1}{n}}\) as:
Does this make sense? Recall that \(\left(\sqrt[n]{a}\right)^n = a\text{.}\) Therefore,
\begin{equation*}
(a^{\frac{1}{n}})^n = a
\end{equation*}
which is what Rules of Exponents would dictate. In the next step, we define \(a^{\frac{m}{n}} = (a^{\frac{1}{n}})^m = (\sqrt[n]{a})^m\) which seems to make sense. Here is a precise definition of a power with a fractional exponent.
Note that \(\sqrt[n]{a}\) exists unless \(n\) is even and \(a\) is negative. The combination of negative radicands (numbers under radicals) and even roots and powers cause a lot of possible problems with the behavior of fractional exponents and Rules of Exponents are not always satisfied.
By definition \(4^{\frac{1}{2}} = \sqrt[2]{4} = \sqrt{4} = 2\text{.}\) Note that \(4^{\frac{1}{2}}\) is the positive of the two square roots of \(4\) as is \(\sqrt{4}\text{.}\)
Depending on your calculator, it may be easier to calculate a fractional power than to enter the corresponding radical. You can simply enter 1700^(1/20). Be sure to use parentheses!
We have defined powers \(a^p\) for integer and fractional exponents \(p\text{.}\) As you may know, not all real numbers can be expressed as fractions (irrational numbers, for example). Can we define powers \(a^p\) for all real numbers \(p\text{?}\) The answer is affirmative provided the base \(a\) is positive. The construction falls outside the scope of this course. It suffices to know that \(a^p\) can be defined for all exponents and Rules of Exponents are preserved. Therefore, we have the following result.
Use Rules of Exponents to simplify the following. Write your answers in terms of powers and not radicals. Assume \(a\text{,}\)\(b\text{,}\)\(x\text{,}\) and \(y\) are all positive.
Solve the equation for \(x\) or for \(b\text{.}\) Be sure to list all solutions. Give exact and approximate values rounded off to three decimal places. If there are no solutions say so.